Wednesday, November 30, 2005

The CIA pressures its Senior Operative to falsify reports to justify war

Tuesday, November 29, 2005

Does honor still exist in the military?

Was he murdered? Colonel Ted Westhusing, a leading scholar on military ethics and honor, received an anonymous complaint that a private security company he oversaw had cheated the U.S. government and committed human rights violations. Westhusing confronted the contractor and reported the concerns to superiors. A few weeks later, he was found dead. The Army claimed he committed suicide. LA Times.

Men of honor don't kill themselves when they've done nothing wrong. Men of honor don't kill themselves so that their son back home is left fatherless and without financial support. This smells of a cover-up. Col. Westhusing only had one month left before he returned and taught at West Point again. There is no point in commit suicide.

The Generals claimed that the allegations the Colonel reported were unfounded. If it were truly unfounded, why did he have to be silenced permanently? Conversely, why would he kill himself if the allegations were unfounded?

President Bush's role in the War

"Ten days after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, President Bush was told in a highly classified briefing that the U.S. intelligence community had no evidence linking the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein to the attacks and that there was scant credible evidence that Iraq had any significant collaborative ties with Al Qaeda, according to government records and current and former officials with firsthand knowledge of the matter.

One of the more intriguing things that Bush was told during the briefing was that the few credible reports of contacts between Iraq and Al Qaeda involved attempts by Saddam Hussein to monitor the terrorist group. Saddam viewed Al Qaeda as well as other theocratic radical Islamist organizations as a potential threat to his secular regime. At one point, analysts believed, Saddam considered infiltrating the ranks of Al Qaeda with Iraqi nationals or even Iraqi intelligence operatives to learn more about its inner workings, according to records and sources.

The September 21, 2001, briefing was prepared at the request of the president, who was eager in the days following the terrorist attacks to learn all that he could about any possible connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda.

...

The Senate Intelligence Committee has asked the White House for the CIA assessment, the PDB of September 21, 2001, and dozens of other PDBs as part of the committee's ongoing investigation into whether the Bush administration misrepresented intelligence information in the run-up to war with Iraq. The Bush administration has refused to turn over these documents.

...

In the four years since Bush received the briefing, according to highly placed government officials, little evidence has come to light to contradict the CIA's original conclusion that no collaborative relationship existed between Iraq and Al Qaeda.

'What the President was told on September 21,' said one former high-level official, 'was consistent with everything he has been told since-that the evidence was just not there.'

In arguing their case for war with Iraq, the president and vice president said after the September 11 attacks that Al Qaeda and Iraq had significant ties, and they cited the possibility that Iraq might share chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons with Al Qaeda for a terrorist attack against the United States.

...

'You can't distinguish between Al Qaeda and Saddam when you talk about the war on terror,' President Bush said on September 25, 2002.

... a comparison of public statements by the president, the vice president, and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld show that in the days just before a congressional vote authorizing war, they professed to have been given information from U.S. intelligence assessments showing evidence of an Iraq-Al Qaeda link.

" -- National Journal

Saturday, November 26, 2005

Manchurian Candidate: Movie Review

Manchurian Candidate with Denzel Washington is a well acted movie. I enjoyed the plot and characters except for the annoying brain dead personality of Meryl Streep but then again maybe some of the politicians are like that. :) The scenes where they show mind control sequences were brief though interesting to watch. They left out some grisly mind control technologies in the movie. My guess is because they wanted to keep the "Rated R" rating, instead of NC-17. The hypnotic triggers they used were primitive and wouldn't be considered safe, but I suppose they had to keep it simplistic for audience viewing purposes.

The main thing that they the movie has us to believe that the Manchurian Global company is behind this and it only happens to prisoners of war. The reality is that the CIA does this to their new recruits, ie. see the case of Candy Jones. Many mind control victims are U.S. citizens and the culprit is often the C.I.A. The enemy is within and not in some far away foreign land.

The symptoms of mind control technologies are pretty accurately portrayed in this movie. This movie is a must see.

Cheney attempts to slant intelligence information to start war

This is hilarious.

Washington Post.

"But in his quiet way, [Cheney] he was insistent, sometimes asking the same question again and again as if he hoped the answer would change, according to people familiar with his contacts with the CIA .... CIA officials repeatedly told Cheney and others in his circle that they did not think Sept. 11 hijacker Mohamed Atta had met with Iraqi agents in Prague, Czech Republic, before the attacks." -- LA Times

'Cheney’s claims about an “established relationship” between Iraq and Al Qaeda were always a principal part of the administration’s case for war, cited by Powell at the United Nations and, most forcefully, by Cheney in numerous speeches and TV interviews before and after the invasion. But it is also a contention that has been seriously undermined by a series of recent U.S. government reports, including the September 11 Commission report, which concluded there was no “collaborative operational relationship” between Iraq and Al Qaeda. Another is a recent CIA analysis, disclosed for the first time this week, raising questions about whether Jordanian terrorist Abu Mussab al-Zarqawi, had been harbored by Saddam’s regime before the war.

Cheney said last night that Zarqawi, who once ran a terror camp in Afghanistan with loose links to Al Qaeda, had “migrated to Baghdad” after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in the fall of 2001 and “set up shop” there, overseeing a “poisons facility” at Kurmal, in northern Iraq.

In fact, U.S. intelligence officials tell NEWSWEEK, after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, Zarqawi went first to Iran—a country that many officials have long believed had far more consequential relationships with terrorist groups, including Al Qaeda, than Saddam’s regime. And while the new CIA report confirms that Zarqawi unquestionably did later move to Baghdad—and received medical treatment there before the war— there is still no hard evidence on whether he was being supported or assisted by Saddam’s regime. “The information on that is not clear,” said one U.S. official familiar with the report. “It’s still being worked.” Cheney also left out the fact that the alleged poisons facility that Zarqawi allegedly supervised was in a part of northern Iraq not controlled by Saddam's government.

...As for administration claims that Iraq was reconstituting its nuclear program—claims that had been championed by Cheney more than any single high-level official—Duelfer found that Saddam had actually abandoned his nuclear efforts years earlier. “He was getting further away from nuclear weapons,” a U.S. government official familiar with Duelfer’s report told reporters yesterday. “He was further away from nuclear weapons in 2003 than he was in 1991.” The nuclear program wasn’t reconstituting, the official said. It was “decaying.”' -- Newsweek

My question: Why does Cheney want war so much? What does he have to gain by this?

Thursday, November 24, 2005

Online Dating Scamming

Who runs our government? Who runs the CIA?

Here's a documentary from Bill Moyers, renowned investigative reporter, about the United States Secret Government. Downloadable files secretgov1.wmv, secretgov2.wmv.

How the U.S. government scares its citizens into doing what it wants

What is war really about?

An essay by Major General Smedley Butler of the U.S. Marine Corps who was awarded two Congressional Medals of Honor and the Distinguished Service Medal.

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

The Pentagon Papers on the Vietnam War

Pentagon Papers. An interesting read.

CIA Quotes

Quotes from the CIA.

"I toiled wholeheartedly in the vineyards because it was fun, fun, fun" ...."Where else could a red-blooded American boy lie, kill, cheat, steal, rape and pillage with the sanction and blessing of the all-highest?" Cpt. George White wrote in a letter to Dr. Sidney Gottlieb. White retired from CIA mind control work in 1966.

Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, Director of the MKULTRA project, trained children to be child sex slaves against their wishes. Claudia Mullens testified at the Advisory Committee hearing about the Deer Creek experiments. Mullens said she was seven years old and was "taught different ways to please men ..."

A major concern for them how to dispose of victims of mind control projects. At first the disposal problem was solved by committing subjects to insane asylums. Some were killed in the experiment and others received icepick lobotomies, which removed or permanently destroyed brain tissue creating confusion and amnesia. Instead of institutionalizing them, etc., they began to erase the memory via hypnosis, drugs and implants. Then in order to solve the problem of memory leaks and repressed memories, false stories, or screen memories were poured in.

Here is what President Truman said of the CIA and its creation, "I think that it was a mistake. And if I'd known what was going to happen, I never would have done it.... But it got out of hand.... Now as nearly as I can make out, those fellows in the CIA don't just report on wars and the like, they go out and make their own and there is nobody to keep track of what they are up to. They spend billions of dollars on stirring up trouble so they will have something to report on. They've become . . . it's become a government of all its own and all secret. They just don't have to report to anybody. . . . The people have got a right to know what those birds are up to."

It is interesting that none of these men were prosecuted for federal crimes. The CIA paid money through settlements for some of the victims but these men themselves were free from prosecution. It goes to show who's backing up these projects if the President and U.S. government refuse to prosecute them. I believe these kinds of experiments are still going on today conducted on law abiding U.S. citizens. I will give more details in a future post.

Friday, November 18, 2005

Mind Control Assassins: Project BLUEBIRD

Hypnosis

"
1954 was the height of Project ARTICHOKE’s attempt to use hypnosis to ‘program’ an assassin. The Agency [CIA] had discovered that “a posthypnotic suggestion is believed to remain effective for several months, and for years if periodically reinforced.” [41] P. 155, 156

J.G. Watkins [42] “induced a soldier to strike a superior officer by suggesting that the officer was a Japanese soldier.” He obtained from a hypnotized WAC “information classified secret that she had previously told him she would not reveal.” Two subjects who were told to throw sulphuric acid at a laboratory assistant (protected by glass) complied with the hypnotist’s commands. [43] P. Janet [44] asked a deeply hypnotized female to commit several murders before a distinguished group of judges, stabbing some victims with rubber daggers and poisoning others with sugar tablets. The hypnotized subject did all these without hesitation. P. 158, 160
"

Overdose victim :)

Thursday, November 17, 2005

No more privacy for citizens

Under this Patriot Act, the FBI can monitor anyone for any reason they feel like and say they are monitoring for terrorist activities. They don't have to have any kind of proof to authorize eavesdropping into a citizen's daily life to tap all his digital life. It reminds me of a Police State where the police can do anything they want to do and claim they are trying to find terrorists. It's a convenient alibi to use for anything they want to do to an ordinary citizen.
I guess Al-Qaeda's plan is working, they want the U.S. government to turn on its own citizens and put them through terror.

When the C.I.A. conducted experiments on mind control, their was some heavy abuse of power as they used U.S. citizens for their experiments.
1
2
CIA Memo documenting experiment creating an assassin
4
5
1977 Senate Hearing
New York Times article

Sunday, November 13, 2005

Bush on War

Pres. Bush claims the criticism will hurt troops but the truth is starting wars without proper preparation and planning is what kills troops. Criticism will help the Pres. see what foolish and hasty decisions he has made with preparation. Criticism is necessary so that an intelligent person can learn from their mistakes. One of the first things a president can do is to take responsibility for his actions and decisions, and stop blaming critics, because he didn't know what he was doing when he started the war. For instance, he didn't prepare for guerilla warfare and how to handle it. The result, troops are dying because of this lack of preparation. Lack of preparation is the predecessor of failure. I believe our troops are patriots. They are there to serve the country. In fact, they are ordered to go over to Iraq and do their "duty" regardless of whether they want to or not. A soldier who refuses will be court martialed and his career and livelihood threatened by the representatives United States. You see he has no choice. The U.S. Army trains soldier to be fearful of what happens when they don't follow orders. They use advanced hypnosis techniques to brainwash soldier into doing what they are ordered. They brainwash the soldiers into fearing the commanding officer so much that they will follow any order to kill or what not. I am trained in hypnosis and I have been in the military so I know their methods, even though the soldiers around me had no idea what was going on or that they were even being brainwashed. The methods are not different from those use in cults to train new methods, except that they are much stronger because the military has "total control" of your life once you sign the papers to join the service. They cut you off from communication with the outside world for weeks at a time while they take control of your mind. By the time they let the solider talk with their family again, the program is already designed to take effect into his mind. If you take a look at Margaret Singer's research on mind control methods, you can see the military follows this step by step, except at a much more intense level.

Friday, November 11, 2005

Interesting Quote ... :)

"Millions of people are concentrating daily on POVERTY and FAILURE and getting both in overabundance.

Wrigley concentrated his mind on the production and sale of a five-cent package of chewing gum and turned this one idea into millions of dollars.

Edison concentrated upon the work of harmonizing natural laws and made his efforts uncover more useful inventions than any other man who ever lived. " -- Napoleon Hill

Saturday, November 05, 2005

World News

Wednesday, November 02, 2005

Whole Week

I've been happy the whole week, except for one day. My wife was out of town the whole time. Coincidence or am I happy without her?

Switched to FireFox

I recently switched from Internet Explorer to Firefox. I can saythat I am much happier. It is fast. It also is fun. :)